logo

You are here

Warning message

Attention! This event has already passed.

he Impact of Banking Market Structure on Bank Performance and SMEs' Acces to Finance in Institutionally Weak Transition Economies: Three Papers on Ukraine

Tuesday, 6 December, 2011 - 16:00
Campus: Brussels Humanities, Sciences & Engineering campus
Faculty: Social Sciences and Solvay Business School
E
0.04
Muzaffarjon Ahunov
phd defence

This dissertation consists of three papers, co-authored with Leo Van Hove and Marc Jegers, that
examine the ways in which variations in banking market structure, in particular in terms of
ownership and market power concentration, affect the performance of banks and the availability
of financing to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). All three papers focus on Ukraine,
an under-researched exemplar of a country with a stagnantly poor institutional environment.
In paper one, we investigate the impact of cross-border takeovers on target banks’ profitability,
efficiency, and market shares. We combine bank-level observations from the National Bank of
Ukraine with unique, self-collected data on cross-border takeovers. Our results show that foreign
investors have acquired Ukrainian banks with average efficiency and profitability, and that these
indicators did not change significantly post-takeover. By contrast, foreign banks have targeted
mainly large banks, and during the first two years following acquisition the targets’ loan market
share and size even increased, whereas funding costs decreased.

In paper two, we investigate foreign banks’ interest in financing Ukrainian SMEs. We use
unique, self-collected bank-level data on banks’ involvement with SMEs in 2004, 2006, 2009,
and 2010. We find that initially foreign banks were neither less nor more interested in financing
SMEs than domestic banks. Over time, an increasing number of the banks that are active in
Ukraine exhibited a higher interest toward SMEs. However, with the surge in foreign-bank
presence in 2005-2006, acquired foreign banks started demonstrating a higher involvement with
SMEs relative to not only domestic banks, but also to greenfield foreign banks. The mode of
entry of foreign banks thus clearly matters. And so does their country of origin: acquired banks
from long-standing market economies are more inclined to offer SME-specific products in
general, whereas their counterparts from post-socialist countries are more likely to provide loans
to SMEs and run SME promotion activities.

In paper three, we investigate the impact of local banking market concentration on SMEs’ access
to finance in the regions of Ukraine. This time we combine firm-level observations from the
EBRD’s BEEPS 2008 survey with self-collected data on local banking markets. We find that, at
low levels, banking market concentration does not affect SMEs’ access to finance independent
of whether they are opaque or not. Only in highly concentrated local banking markets, opaque
firms are more likely to perceive access to finance as a major or very severe obstacle relative to
their non-opaque counterparts. This contrasts with the theories that claim that higher banking
market concentration improves access to finance for opaque firms.

Attachment: 
PDF icon Ahunov_a.pdf